Guide
A fraction of a percent per year sounds like nothing. Compounded over a career, it is six figures.
An expense ratio is the annual percentage a fund charges to operate. A 0.20% expense ratio means $2 per year for every $1,000 invested.
You never write a check. The fee is subtracted from the fund's assets daily, so the return you see reported is already net of it. This is precisely why fees are easy to ignore — nothing ever arrives demanding payment.
| Fund | Tracks | Expense ratio | Cost per $10k/yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOO | S&P 500 | 0.03% | $3 |
| VTI | US total market | 0.03% | $3 |
| VUG | US large growth | 0.04% | $4 |
| VXUS | International | 0.05% | $5 |
| SCHD | US dividend | 0.06% | $6 |
| FTEC | US tech sector | 0.084% | $8 |
| VNQ | US REITs | 0.13% | $13 |
| QQQM | Nasdaq-100 | 0.15% | $15 |
| IWM | US small cap | 0.19% | $19 |
| ONEQ | Nasdaq Composite | 0.21% | $21 |
| FBND | US bonds, active | 0.36% | $36 |
| GLD | Gold | 0.40% | $40 |
Annually these look trivial. Over decades, on a growing balance, they are not.
Every figure on this page came from the calculator. Change the inputs to match your own situation and watch what moves.
Open the calculator$10,000 to start, $500 a month, 7% gross return, 30 years:
| Expense ratio | Final balance | Lost to fees |
|---|---|---|
| 0.03% | $657,000 | $3,900 |
| 0.15% | $641,800 | $19,100 |
| 0.50% | $599,700 | $61,200 |
| 1.00% | $544,700 | $116,200 |
The gap between a 0.03% index fund and a 1.00% actively managed fund is over $112,000 — roughly a fifth of the entire balance, gone, for a fund that did not necessarily perform any better.
Both track the Nasdaq-100. Identical holdings, identical weights.
The 0.05% difference is $5 per year on $10,000. Over 30 years on a portfolio growing past $600,000, it is roughly $8,000. Not life-changing, but it is free money for holding a different ticker for the same exposure.
The case for QQQ over QQQM is liquidity for active options trading. If you are buying monthly and holding for decades, that advantage does not apply to you.
Cheapest is not automatically correct. A higher expense ratio can be reasonable when the fund provides exposure you cannot get cheaply elsewhere — certain international, sector, or commodity funds — or when the alternative is not owning the asset class at all.
What is rarely defensible is paying 0.50% or more for a fund that tracks a broad U.S. index available for 0.03%. That is the same product at fifteen times the price.
Also worth checking: bid-ask spreads on thinly traded funds, trading commissions if your broker still charges them, and tax drag in a taxable account from funds with high turnover. Expense ratios are the most visible cost, not the only one.
You cannot control what the market returns. You cannot control inflation or when the next downturn arrives. You can control exactly what you pay, and that choice compounds for as long as you hold the fund.
Advertiser disclosure: the links below are referral links. If you open an account through one, this site may earn a commission at no cost to you. This never affects the data shown above or the order funds are listed in. These are not recommendations, and this site does not provide investment advice.
The other input that quietly determines your entire projection.
Why small percentages turn into large numbers given enough time.